Corporate shirt. PR flack. Web guy. Blogger. Beverage enthusiast. Hubby. Daddy. Diggity. Giggity.
36 hour 'til Monday. 54 dollars and change.

Move over, "M*A*S*H" finale. You've finally been surpassed.According to Nielsen ratings estimates published in Hollywood trade publications, Sunday's Super Bowl XLIV - in which the New Orleans Saints beat the Indianapolis Colts 31-17 - now holds the record for viewership. The event was watched by 106.5 million viewers, slightly more than the famed 1983 "Goodbye, Farewell and Amen" conclusion to "M*A*S*H," which was watched by 105.97 million.
As I browse through some of my favorite all-time Super Bowl ads (and am still torn between "Wassup" and "Gerbils" but that's just me) I can't help but think of all the hubbub surrounding Pepsi's call to sit out this year's ad blitz in place of a philanthropic web campaign called the Pepsi Refresh Project. The news first broke back in early January (February for some slowpokes) and had me first thinking, "Good for them, why not try?" Who needs to spend millions of dollars year after year on silly little spots when you can save the world through social media? From a marketer's perspective, what better brand refresh is there than that?
Fast forward to tonight's game, and I can't help but wonder if Pepsi is wishing they hadn't bucked the trend. SI writer Richard Deitsch reports that CBS expects record ratings for Super Bowl XLIV. As Deitsch highlights, it's the first time in ages that both top seeds from the AFC and NFC made the game. President Obama is part of the pregame show. The Saints' take their first ever shot at the Lombardi trophy, pre- or post-Katrina, while the Colts aim to secure a dynasty. And while it's never been achieved, over 100 million viewers may tune in for epic football, The Who and Lady Gaga at halftime and -- o, yeah -- the ads.

Honestly, though, it Pepsi's bet on the big game going to fizzle or go flat? I can't say for sure. Nobody can except consumers. I'm rooting for the socially responsible side of Pepsi but, after recent reconsideration, am befuddled by their brand strategy. Think about it:
Media circles were abuzz over Pepsi's move, and PR nodded its head at the kind of coverage money can't buy. That was four weeks ago. Not yesterday's but last month's news. The Refresh Project will live for some time and make the world a better place, I truly hope. But that's not why I buy soft drinks.
We're just moments away from prime time and the pundits are feverishly postdating their analyses. Will the experiment work? We shall see. In the spirit of full disclosure, I should reveal that I prefer Coke over Pepsi, which has subjected me to near fist fights over the years. And this is a good time to put down my blog, pick up the remote and join the rest of the world to watch the Saints beat the Colts, 31-24.This blog is the sole property of Dino Baskovic. Any re-transmission of this post for commercial or personal use without the express written consent of Dino Baskovic is strictly prohibited. Oh, who am I kidding?
As for simplicity, I guess the Cleveland Browns score highest. They use no logo at all but why do the Browns have orange helmets?
Good question. Best I could come up with without calling the front office:
In the 1950 and 1951 seasons, the Browns wore the white helmets in day games and plain orange helmets in night games because of an NFL rule prohibiting the use of white or light-colored helmets for night games because of the lighting and the use of a white football for night games.
The Cleveland Browns used to have their training camp at Bowling Green [State University. So,] to honor [the school] the Browns adopted [BGSU's collegiate colors].
And now you almost know. On that note, which helmets and jerseys make you glad or gag?
Bears 30, Browns 6. We had a Brady Quinn sighting late in this one; that should tell you how it went. Cleveland turned it over five times, but don't worry. They, the Rams, and the Raiders have their byes next week, so the average quality of football should rise dramatically.
Also: Ravens ruins the Broncos' once-perfect season, 30-7. Which is about as bad for Cleveland fans as watching Sabathia v. Lee in the World Series.
UPDATE: Lions aren't so cowardly, after all. Detroit 19, Washington 14.
This sucks for Detroit fans:
Free Press sports writer Shawn Windsor is live-blogging today's blacked-out game between the Detroit Lions and the Redskins. Per NFL rules, he may not be in the stadium while live-blogging, so he drove to a Buffalo Wild Wings in Grand Rapids to watch it on TV.
Good call on B-Dubs. I should drive down and meet him. Mmm. Honey mustard...
Even though I root for the Browns, I and other football fans kinda wonder when the Lions will end their 20-game losing streak. They are less than three two minutes away from doing so against the Redskins (who just scored a late TD and are within 5 and a horrific upset, onside kick notwithstanding).
Back to glorious HD. I can't believe I'm about to say this: Go Lions!?
UPDATE 2: Additional coverage: Detroit Free Press, Detroit News, ESPN (via AP), NBC, CBS and my favorite tidbit from Deadspin:
It's over! For the first time since 2007, the Detroit Lions are winners. Matthew Stafford looked like an NFL quarterback, and Clinton Portis couldn't get going, so Detroit dominated possession. Washington simultaneously becomes a trivia answer and a punchline.